data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ff66c/ff66c9a1f83571156bc375e8ad46e2fd217e95a0" alt=""
Scenario #1:
Suppose you're walking all alone on a quiet, empty beach. Suddenly you hear a cry for help, and, looking out to the water, briefly see a child's head, with arms flailing about uselessly. Then the child goes under again. That child is drowning! Though an adequate swimmer, you're not sure you can swim well enough to reach and save the child, so instead you kneel on the sand and pray for God to save him. Such prayer is a sin, a sin of omission. It is a sinful prayer, or, if you prefer, a prayerful sin.Scenario #2:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/80c95/80c95fe57e3b5a3ebf8da42c633468ad4f14b963" alt=""
Scenario #3:
Finally, suppose that the children are deliberately being drowned by an armed detachment of government agents. Any attempt to rescue the children or even to interfere is immediately quashed. Moreover, everyone on the beach is being compelled to assist in the drowning operation. Some people are praying for the children, for a miraculous rescue, even as they willingly comply. Some are also fasting. Some are mailing red envelopes in protest.From a moral standpoint, the biggest difference between scenario 3 and scenarios 1 & 2 is that the sin has become one of commission, not omission. To actively cooperate in evil is of greater moral magnitude than to passively omit doing good.
Please consider how your taxes pay for the slaughter of the innocents, and what your willing cooperation in that slaughter really means.
No comments:
Post a Comment